five. Discovered Deputy Prosecutor General and also counsel to the complainant further argued that during the investigation on the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led to your recovery of sleeping pills on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has been made before the Court wherein the sleeping pills were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected inside the liver although not inside the belly. Therefore, the recovery of explained sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Acquired Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel to the complainant have also argued that during the investigation of your case the petitioner Bhoora led towards the recovery of the motorcycle.
Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life and the importance of maintaining regulation and order in society.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court could interfere with the summary or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it suitable to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified with the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
The said recovery might be used, in the most, for corroboration from the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be considered a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of occurrence. The stated memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as very little was discovered as a result of this kind of pointation. The place of event and also the place of throwing the dead body were already within the knowledge of witnesses just before their pointation because of the petitioners. Reliance is also placed on case regulation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held because of the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
With the foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more
be founded without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is actually a horrifying reality, an extremely very low threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
Extra username and password are expected for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe to be a foster child. Even though the couple experienced two younger children of their possess at home, the social worker did not inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement inside the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple had youthful children.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent as well as the case under appeal, Maybe overruling the previous case regulation by setting a brand new precedent of higher authority. This may perhaps take place several times as the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first on the High Court of Justice, later from the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his development on the concept of estoppel starting in the High Trees case.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This article delves into the intricacies in the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant check here case regulation, to deliver an extensive understanding of its implications and simple applications.
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to the healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there aren't any specific provisions within the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental regulation in Pakistan, it truly is important that the case established the application on the precautionary principle where there is usually a risk to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations on the State in protecting the right to your clean and healthy environment.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were explained to of the boy’s past, they requested if their children were Protected with him in their home. The therapist assured them that they had almost nothing to fret about.